So some have been writing asking where I've been over the last month.
The answer is "following a new path that has led to a new fork in the road and a new path to follow moving forward. A new opportunity that will lead to a new direction in my life - one filled with awesome opportunity and a real chance to make a difference."
I'm excited about this new opportunity.
While it's not something I had thought about two months ago, I am filled with ideas and energy that had been missing for a while. It's also going to change the content and direction of this blog.
Blog's are, regardless of topic, designed as an outlet or an escape for those who have more to say and need to get those thoughts and ideas out. For me it has been an internal examination through my external journey. I've looked at who I am and what type of person I want to be for myself, my family and the community at large.
In rereading many of my former entries, I realize that the time has come for me to stop talking the talk and start walking the walk.
From this point forward, this blog becomes "Lessons in Leadership - and other things I've learned along the way."
Instead of being critical of our elected leaders, I will begin to examine myself, my actions and the impact I am making on others. This will become more self analytical and less externally critical.
A new direction in life requires new actions and new thoughts. A new opportunity requires at least a review of the way I approach leadership and the leader I aspire to be.
If you'd like to follow me on the journey you're more than welcome. If you're looking for continued thoughts on elected leaders, our political system and the need for social change - I might suggest http://weblogs.macleans.ca/paulwells/. Paul's an amazing writing with a great inside look at what's happening at the very epicenter of Canadian politics.
For those who will move on from this blog - thanks for reading and writing -your comments have been insightful.
For those who will continue on the new journey - fasten your seatbelts... It's going to be one hell of a ride!!
Sunday, May 21, 2006
Good Advice
Life's Journey
Do not undermine your worth by comparing yourself with others.It is because we are different that each of us is special.
Do not set your goals by what other people deem important.Only you know what is best for you.Do not take for granted the things closest to your heart.
Cling to them as you would your life, for without them, life is meaningless.Do not let your life slip through your fingers by living in the past nor for the future. By living your life one day at a time, you live all of the days of your life.Do not give up when you still have something to give.Nothing is really over until the moment you stop trying.It is a fragile thread that binds us to each other.
Do not be afraid to encounter risks.It is by taking chances that we learn how to be brave.Do not shut love out of your life by saying it is impossible to find.The quickest way to receive love is to give love.The fastest way to lose love is too hold it too tightly.In addition, the best way to keep love is to give it wings
Do not dismiss your dreams.To be without dreams is to be without hope.To be without hope is to be without purpose.Do not run through life so fast that you forget not only where you have been, but also where you are going.
Life is not a race, but a journey to be savored each step of the way
Do not undermine your worth by comparing yourself with others.It is because we are different that each of us is special.
Do not set your goals by what other people deem important.Only you know what is best for you.Do not take for granted the things closest to your heart.
Cling to them as you would your life, for without them, life is meaningless.Do not let your life slip through your fingers by living in the past nor for the future. By living your life one day at a time, you live all of the days of your life.Do not give up when you still have something to give.Nothing is really over until the moment you stop trying.It is a fragile thread that binds us to each other.
Do not be afraid to encounter risks.It is by taking chances that we learn how to be brave.Do not shut love out of your life by saying it is impossible to find.The quickest way to receive love is to give love.The fastest way to lose love is too hold it too tightly.In addition, the best way to keep love is to give it wings
Do not dismiss your dreams.To be without dreams is to be without hope.To be without hope is to be without purpose.Do not run through life so fast that you forget not only where you have been, but also where you are going.
Life is not a race, but a journey to be savored each step of the way
Wednesday, April 19, 2006
Cooperative Leadership
I had the good fortune of attending a luncheon this week with NB Premier Bernard Lord and Quebec Premier Jean Charest.
While each man is struggling with support in their respective provinces, it is clear that both are part of a growing movement of provincial leaders turning to the national stage to boost their support.
Lord, whose on again/off again look at the national conservative leadership left some wondering if he really was national material, is now positioning himself as a statesman among provincial leaders.
Charest, who once was thought to be the Great White Hope has continued to fade and is now looking at how he can salvage a dissapointing political career.
Together they have much in common and they are smart enough to know that by combining forces they can help each other within their own provinces.
Yesterday's theme of partnership was a synonym for federalism and it is clear that Jean Charest and Bernard Lord are going to be the leaders that help save Canada during the next Quebec referendum.
Yesterday's speech was more of a mutual admiration society with Lord praising Charest and Charest praising Lord - and guess what.... it worked!! The National Press core picked up the story - despite very little substance to the "partnership" luncheon.
This is a trend we should expect to see more of.
With Prime Minister Stephen Harper assuming a very "Prime Ministerial" role and sticking to national issues, it has created more room for our provincial leaders to generate some national exposure and raise their popularity at home.
It's a good plan that could actually be good for the country, but it also has the potential of being nothing more than masterful Public Relations.
The electorate and the media should take heed and proceed cautiously with any optimism.
Our Provincial leaders should also proceed cautiously and work to produce positive, impactful differences to the lives of Canadians.
That in itselfwouldl also boost their numbers!
While each man is struggling with support in their respective provinces, it is clear that both are part of a growing movement of provincial leaders turning to the national stage to boost their support.
Lord, whose on again/off again look at the national conservative leadership left some wondering if he really was national material, is now positioning himself as a statesman among provincial leaders.
Charest, who once was thought to be the Great White Hope has continued to fade and is now looking at how he can salvage a dissapointing political career.
Together they have much in common and they are smart enough to know that by combining forces they can help each other within their own provinces.
Yesterday's theme of partnership was a synonym for federalism and it is clear that Jean Charest and Bernard Lord are going to be the leaders that help save Canada during the next Quebec referendum.
Yesterday's speech was more of a mutual admiration society with Lord praising Charest and Charest praising Lord - and guess what.... it worked!! The National Press core picked up the story - despite very little substance to the "partnership" luncheon.
This is a trend we should expect to see more of.
With Prime Minister Stephen Harper assuming a very "Prime Ministerial" role and sticking to national issues, it has created more room for our provincial leaders to generate some national exposure and raise their popularity at home.
It's a good plan that could actually be good for the country, but it also has the potential of being nothing more than masterful Public Relations.
The electorate and the media should take heed and proceed cautiously with any optimism.
Our Provincial leaders should also proceed cautiously and work to produce positive, impactful differences to the lives of Canadians.
That in itselfwouldl also boost their numbers!
Tuesday, April 04, 2006
The Tale of Two Minorities
This week is an interesting one in Canadian politics. The 39th session of Pariliament kicks off today in Ottawa with the Speech from the Throne. Prime Minister Harper is expected to move quickly to introduce key pieces of legislation from the campaign including the highly publicized Accountability Legislation that is intended to prevent future Sponsorship Scandals from occuring.
This will be a tough session on the Prime Minister. With only 125 out of 308 seats in Parliament he must continue to engage opposition parties if he hopes to achieve anything at all. As well, an Ipsos poll yesterday, while suggesting most Canadians want some stability for at least a year, also shows that the majority of Canadians are in favour of forcing an election if the government doesn't fulfil its promises early on.
Making it even more difficult will be the dimishing "benefit of the doubt" attitude for Prime Minister Harper from the national press corps. While the tactic of controlling all access and managing each message to within an inch of its death has allowed the PM to appear very Prime Ministerial (dare we even say Presidential) the national press gang will not allow the honeymoon continue if they can't access and stories.
So the PM must appease opposition, the electorate and the press corp and, by all accounts he has about 30 days to do it all...talk about pressure!!
On the home front, Premier Bernard Lord is facing a struggle of his own as he continues to skate the line between saving his government and being forced into an election. His campaign style spending spree is just taunting the opposition to force an election call the Premier can say "We didn't want an election - just like New Brunswickers don't want an election. But since the big bad Liberals have forced one - look at all the money we've spent."
This is not a new election tactic. The federal Liberals used is just before the last federal election. Except the Premier is forgetting one important fact. The electorate is smarter than that and the campaign spending bonanza - while nice - does not ensure victory.
The debate this week on the good news provincial budget will be an interesting one and a real test for government.
So there you have it - the ongoing saga of two minorities - each with its challenges. Each trying to find that elusive middle ground that allows governments to stay in power term after term.
The real question however is how effective will the opposition parties be at exposing these weaknesses. If played right we could have two elections this year.
if not, both governments will live to fight another day...maybe even longer.
This will be a tough session on the Prime Minister. With only 125 out of 308 seats in Parliament he must continue to engage opposition parties if he hopes to achieve anything at all. As well, an Ipsos poll yesterday, while suggesting most Canadians want some stability for at least a year, also shows that the majority of Canadians are in favour of forcing an election if the government doesn't fulfil its promises early on.
Making it even more difficult will be the dimishing "benefit of the doubt" attitude for Prime Minister Harper from the national press corps. While the tactic of controlling all access and managing each message to within an inch of its death has allowed the PM to appear very Prime Ministerial (dare we even say Presidential) the national press gang will not allow the honeymoon continue if they can't access and stories.
So the PM must appease opposition, the electorate and the press corp and, by all accounts he has about 30 days to do it all...talk about pressure!!
On the home front, Premier Bernard Lord is facing a struggle of his own as he continues to skate the line between saving his government and being forced into an election. His campaign style spending spree is just taunting the opposition to force an election call the Premier can say "We didn't want an election - just like New Brunswickers don't want an election. But since the big bad Liberals have forced one - look at all the money we've spent."
This is not a new election tactic. The federal Liberals used is just before the last federal election. Except the Premier is forgetting one important fact. The electorate is smarter than that and the campaign spending bonanza - while nice - does not ensure victory.
The debate this week on the good news provincial budget will be an interesting one and a real test for government.
So there you have it - the ongoing saga of two minorities - each with its challenges. Each trying to find that elusive middle ground that allows governments to stay in power term after term.
The real question however is how effective will the opposition parties be at exposing these weaknesses. If played right we could have two elections this year.
if not, both governments will live to fight another day...maybe even longer.
Wednesday, March 29, 2006
Escapes To Fight Another Day
It appears that New Brunswick Premier Bernard Lord was able to escape a potential election campaign this week thanks to some political savvy and a booming economy.
The move to put defector Tanker Malley in the Speakers Chair gave the ex-pat from Miramichi the "power" he so desperately wanted. The smile that filled his face after being appointed speaker showed that recognition and a big chair are enough to please those with simple needs.
The good news budget filled with new money and tax cuts is thanks to a booming Canadian economy, a great New Brunswick business sector and some sound leadership in our New Brunswick boardrooms.
So the Lord government may escape to fight another day - but should they run?
In my opinion, the Liberals under Shawn Graham have overplayed their current lead in the polls and may have underestimated the ability for Lord to save his premiership. While the Liberals enjoy a 15 point lead and victories in the last 2 byelections, New Brunswickers, like all Canadians, are not overly keen on going to the polls anytime soon.
As well, despite an overwhelming desire and committment, Shawn Graham has yet to convince everyone he has the ability to be a Premier.
The Liberals, who continued to talk about defeating the government now have to continue to push the issue. The problem is they may lose either way. If they can't force the government into an early election they look weak. If they do force an election they risk alienating the electorate and facing trouble at the polls.
The Conservatives have played it smart, and may see a boost in popular opinion- so much so they may wish they had not averted the election to a time when New Brunswickers may forget all the good news.
Then again, maybe that's been the plan all along and an election will be called if the polling shows enough of a boost to hit the campaign trail. Then they can blame the Liberals for forcing the campaign.
The Strategy in politics is a tricky affair. No wonder so many potential leaders run the other way!
The move to put defector Tanker Malley in the Speakers Chair gave the ex-pat from Miramichi the "power" he so desperately wanted. The smile that filled his face after being appointed speaker showed that recognition and a big chair are enough to please those with simple needs.
The good news budget filled with new money and tax cuts is thanks to a booming Canadian economy, a great New Brunswick business sector and some sound leadership in our New Brunswick boardrooms.
So the Lord government may escape to fight another day - but should they run?
In my opinion, the Liberals under Shawn Graham have overplayed their current lead in the polls and may have underestimated the ability for Lord to save his premiership. While the Liberals enjoy a 15 point lead and victories in the last 2 byelections, New Brunswickers, like all Canadians, are not overly keen on going to the polls anytime soon.
As well, despite an overwhelming desire and committment, Shawn Graham has yet to convince everyone he has the ability to be a Premier.
The Liberals, who continued to talk about defeating the government now have to continue to push the issue. The problem is they may lose either way. If they can't force the government into an early election they look weak. If they do force an election they risk alienating the electorate and facing trouble at the polls.
The Conservatives have played it smart, and may see a boost in popular opinion- so much so they may wish they had not averted the election to a time when New Brunswickers may forget all the good news.
Then again, maybe that's been the plan all along and an election will be called if the polling shows enough of a boost to hit the campaign trail. Then they can blame the Liberals for forcing the campaign.
The Strategy in politics is a tricky affair. No wonder so many potential leaders run the other way!
Monday, March 20, 2006
Ethically Unethical
So the Prime Minister responded today to the Ethic Commissioners report that states the David Emerson defection to the Conservatives 9 days after being elected a Liberal was not, in any way, unethical.
While Emerson's poltical opportunism may not be reason for an investigation in the eyes of the Ethics Commissioner -but let's not forget that this is the same ethics commissioner that the PM all but fired just days ago.
It's interesting that the Commissioner's announcement to investigate the defection brought a refusal to cooperate but the decision not to investigate brings acknowledgement (albeit indignant acknowledgement).
Despite what the Commissioner believes, the Prime Minister should listen to Canadians and do the right thing. Call a byelection in BC and let Emerson win (or lose) as a member of the government.
At the very least allow Emerson to sit as a backbencher until his constituents have had a say. Then we'll see how committed a politician Mr. Emerson is. My guess is no glory - no show!
It's really ashame when the world's second oldest profession and the world's oldest profession get so blurred!!
Sunday, March 19, 2006
The Date Has Been Set - Does Anyone Care?
The National Executive for the Liberal Party of Canada has set Dec 2nd and 3rd in Montreal as the date for the party to elect its next leader. As well the party has revealed that it has loosened the rules governing who can enter the race and has said it has plans to make up its $4 million debt by Fall.
Now with only one declared candidate the question we have to ask is that does anyone care about this leadership convention and, more importantly, how will the party get its membership excited about the convention and, more importantly, rebuilding the party around its new leader.
For one, the party executive and staffers in Ottawa need to spend a lot of time counselling regular members from coast to coast to coast on what is needed in a leader. It's not time to charge forward and use similar tactics to when Paul Martin was running for the leadership - tactics that divided the party, caused Sheila Copps and John Manley to run away from the party and laid the path to the last election. Instead its time to look, listen and allow ordinary Canadians the chance to pick its leader in the most inclusive way possible. The party should look at options like one member one vote - ensuring that all members have a say - not just those elected at a riding association meeting.
The convention in December should be used as an opportunity to speak to Canadians about where this party has been and, more importantly, where this party wants to go. How it can provide a true vision and true and valid option for Canadians.
The convention should be the party's new beginning. A chance to show that despite the recent loss and the issues that plagued the party - the Liberal Party of Canada is still the most representative party for all Canadians.
If these steps aren't taken and the December covention is nothing but a coronation of who the decision makers want to be leader I predict the "winner" should get used to parking at Stornoway for many years.
P.S. - Former Prime Minister Paul Martin quietly Resigned today as official leader of the Liberal Party. Martin has done all he can and discovered it was not the right time for him with the Canadian people. The one consolation he can have is that he was able to shake the ghosts of the past that ensured his father, Paul Martin Sr., was never able to run for the top job - that and the fact that he can go back to his shipping company and make millions before he retires in luxury. Good Luck Mr. Martin and thanks for your service to your country.
Now with only one declared candidate the question we have to ask is that does anyone care about this leadership convention and, more importantly, how will the party get its membership excited about the convention and, more importantly, rebuilding the party around its new leader.
For one, the party executive and staffers in Ottawa need to spend a lot of time counselling regular members from coast to coast to coast on what is needed in a leader. It's not time to charge forward and use similar tactics to when Paul Martin was running for the leadership - tactics that divided the party, caused Sheila Copps and John Manley to run away from the party and laid the path to the last election. Instead its time to look, listen and allow ordinary Canadians the chance to pick its leader in the most inclusive way possible. The party should look at options like one member one vote - ensuring that all members have a say - not just those elected at a riding association meeting.
The convention in December should be used as an opportunity to speak to Canadians about where this party has been and, more importantly, where this party wants to go. How it can provide a true vision and true and valid option for Canadians.
The convention should be the party's new beginning. A chance to show that despite the recent loss and the issues that plagued the party - the Liberal Party of Canada is still the most representative party for all Canadians.
If these steps aren't taken and the December covention is nothing but a coronation of who the decision makers want to be leader I predict the "winner" should get used to parking at Stornoway for many years.
P.S. - Former Prime Minister Paul Martin quietly Resigned today as official leader of the Liberal Party. Martin has done all he can and discovered it was not the right time for him with the Canadian people. The one consolation he can have is that he was able to shake the ghosts of the past that ensured his father, Paul Martin Sr., was never able to run for the top job - that and the fact that he can go back to his shipping company and make millions before he retires in luxury. Good Luck Mr. Martin and thanks for your service to your country.
Wednesday, March 15, 2006
A Leader To Be Proud Of?
Throughout history, human conflict has helped to create leaders. Those in power during times of war have, in most cases, experienced a surge in popularity as citizens rally behind their leader in troubled times.
In Canada, this has not been a common occurance however, as our role in most conflicts has been that of peacekeeper - if we participated at all.
Yesterday, Prime Minister Stephen Harper - following a very secret trip to Afghanistan, spent a full day in the war torn country - rallying our troops. Talking about Canada assuming a leadership role in the world.
For many countries, participation in war defines who they are. For Canada, our role has typically been one of peace.
From a communications perspective, the Prime Minister received great advice. His trip showed a leader praising our amazing men and women in extraordinary circumstances. I predict that the PM's popularity numbers will soar as Canadians feel the pride of their leader.
For some however the trip might appear a little too American.
Don't get me wrong. I am proud of our men and women and the work they are doing in the war torn country and the Prime Minister's presence increases the visibility of the work they are doing - which is good.. But this very Bush like trip feels foreign.
The PM will not get flack over the trip. As I said his numbers will rise. I just hope that taking leads from American political leaders won't translate into other areas like domestic policy.
The National Post said that the PM's visit showed he is a prime minister we can finally be proud of. I still thinlk time will tell. With the start this Conservative government has had it will take more than a PR trip to create long-lasting legacy.
Sent on the TELUS Mobility network with BlackBerry
Sunday, March 12, 2006
A Quiet Leader Passes
Bernie "Boom Boom" Geoffrion" considered by many as the inventor of the slap shot has died at the age of 75.
Geoffrion was only the second (teammate Rocket Richard was the first) to score 50 goals in a season. He helped to make the Montreal Canadiens the dynasty they were.
Since then hockey and hockey players have taken different approaches to the game and why it is played. Unsung heros like Boom Boom seem more passionate about the playing than the money which is an attitude that does not seem to have lasted the test of time.
Geoffrion's passing, while sad, is a blessing for he and his family as the pain he has endured has finally ended.
Boom Boom was a leader in hockey and in life and set an example to live by.
John Quincy Adams once said "If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader."
You have inspired many to do more and become more. For that we all thank you.
Now it is time to rest.
Geoffrion was only the second (teammate Rocket Richard was the first) to score 50 goals in a season. He helped to make the Montreal Canadiens the dynasty they were.
Since then hockey and hockey players have taken different approaches to the game and why it is played. Unsung heros like Boom Boom seem more passionate about the playing than the money which is an attitude that does not seem to have lasted the test of time.
Geoffrion's passing, while sad, is a blessing for he and his family as the pain he has endured has finally ended.
Boom Boom was a leader in hockey and in life and set an example to live by.
John Quincy Adams once said "If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader."
You have inspired many to do more and become more. For that we all thank you.
Now it is time to rest.
Thursday, March 09, 2006
Is Number 6 On The Way?
Prime Minister Stephen Harper is continuing to get hammered over the David Emerson boondoggle - most recently over his decision to tell the Ethics Commissioner to take a hike.
Let's not beat around the bush here - the Prime Minister is wrong.
It doesn't matter that Bernard Shapiro is a liberal appointed ethics commissioner with very little credibility left in most circles.
It doesn't matter that the opposition continues to try and make political hay over the issue.
What matters - THE ONLY THING THAT MATTERS - is that the Prime Minister is following a course of action that completely contradicts everything he campaigned on. It contradicts everything that Canadians liked about his message of accountability, honesty and integrity.
The comments from the Prime Minister's newest Director of Communications certainly did not help the situation stating the PM is "Loath" to cooperate with the Ethics Commissioner (Do I smell number 6?)
Regardless of the nuisance and the time it is the PM's duty to go through the process, give credence to the issue and take any recommendations under advisement. Instead, discrediting the commissioner and claiming political interference smacks of the same old political BS.
If you meant you would bring a different kind of government - prove it.
Let the commissioner conduct his study and pay attention to what he and Canadians are saying.
The real question here is why is this "accountable" government giving the Ethics Commissioner any kind of issue to deal with during the first 30 days in office. For their sakes - and ours - I hope this is not a sign of things to come.
Let's not beat around the bush here - the Prime Minister is wrong.
It doesn't matter that Bernard Shapiro is a liberal appointed ethics commissioner with very little credibility left in most circles.
It doesn't matter that the opposition continues to try and make political hay over the issue.
What matters - THE ONLY THING THAT MATTERS - is that the Prime Minister is following a course of action that completely contradicts everything he campaigned on. It contradicts everything that Canadians liked about his message of accountability, honesty and integrity.
The comments from the Prime Minister's newest Director of Communications certainly did not help the situation stating the PM is "Loath" to cooperate with the Ethics Commissioner (Do I smell number 6?)
Regardless of the nuisance and the time it is the PM's duty to go through the process, give credence to the issue and take any recommendations under advisement. Instead, discrediting the commissioner and claiming political interference smacks of the same old political BS.
If you meant you would bring a different kind of government - prove it.
Let the commissioner conduct his study and pay attention to what he and Canadians are saying.
The real question here is why is this "accountable" government giving the Ethics Commissioner any kind of issue to deal with during the first 30 days in office. For their sakes - and ours - I hope this is not a sign of things to come.
Tuesday, March 07, 2006
A Balanced Approach
Over the past couple of weeks I have given a hard time to those within the Liberal Party of Canada seemed on speeding towards the next election - instead of pausing to determine where they should head and what exactly the Canadian public is looking for.
Yesterday, Islander turned New Brunswickers turned Central Canadian Steven MacKinnon returned to Moncton to speak to his former colleagues at the Moncton Rotary Club with a much more neutral and strategic approach.
As National Director of the Liberal Party - it's MacKinnon's role to help to redefine the party and to seek out the new vision and new direction that will take the party into the next 15 years and MacKinnon is smart enough to understand that more of the same will not work. Don't rush towards the finish line - otherwise you won't like the place you've finished.
It's also a time where some in the party are calling for MacKinnon's head as an architect for the failed election campaign.
While National Directors sometimes pay the price, it may be time to keep some consistency in Ottawa as well. As long as those in charge remember that this great party is one that needs to reflect the values of Canadians from coast to coast to coast.
It's a time of rebuilding. Don't rush to fill a void just because. Do it because it's the right thing to do for Canadians. Keeping searching for new ideas and new visions. Encourage our young leaders of tomorrow to start speaking today.
Share...
Debate...
Argue...
Dream...
most of all Listen!
Yesterday, Islander turned New Brunswickers turned Central Canadian Steven MacKinnon returned to Moncton to speak to his former colleagues at the Moncton Rotary Club with a much more neutral and strategic approach.
As National Director of the Liberal Party - it's MacKinnon's role to help to redefine the party and to seek out the new vision and new direction that will take the party into the next 15 years and MacKinnon is smart enough to understand that more of the same will not work. Don't rush towards the finish line - otherwise you won't like the place you've finished.
It's also a time where some in the party are calling for MacKinnon's head as an architect for the failed election campaign.
While National Directors sometimes pay the price, it may be time to keep some consistency in Ottawa as well. As long as those in charge remember that this great party is one that needs to reflect the values of Canadians from coast to coast to coast.
It's a time of rebuilding. Don't rush to fill a void just because. Do it because it's the right thing to do for Canadians. Keeping searching for new ideas and new visions. Encourage our young leaders of tomorrow to start speaking today.
Share...
Debate...
Argue...
Dream...
most of all Listen!
Friday, March 03, 2006
Quiet Acceptance
So I've spent the last couple of days in our nations capital trying to get a better perspective on where the Harper government is headed on some key issues including the environment, sustainability and infrastructure.
What I found most interesting is the quiet acceptance (bordering on quiet enthusiasm) from the same people who just months ago were heralding the liberal direction as the right thing to do.
Ottawa's a funny town with loyalty that seems to last about as long as it is convenient - but this latest environment seems to be born out of a deep desire for stability.
Sometimes we tend to forget that the civil service is made up of regular folks likes you and I who are looking for the same qualities of leadership.
While they may tend to be even more cynical than most because they literally see governments come and go, they are still searching for some consistent, sustainable government.
It's the "let's give these guys a genuine chance to do what they said they would do." It's just that no one is standing from the rooftops saying it.
It's a quiet wait and see attitude.
For the three opposition parties, it would be wise to understand this sentiment and not do too much to rock the boat.
For those three key strategists that have formed the transition team for Interim Leader Graham - get a good handle on the current environment before you make decisions. It's time to put the politics on the back burner.. for the sake of all Canadians.
The Liberals time will come again. In fact If I were a betting man I would say it will come sooner than later - but it has to happen because that is what Canadians want.
The Quiet Acceptance should not be ignored...
By saying nothing, the Ottawa hoard is actually saying a lot!
What I found most interesting is the quiet acceptance (bordering on quiet enthusiasm) from the same people who just months ago were heralding the liberal direction as the right thing to do.
Ottawa's a funny town with loyalty that seems to last about as long as it is convenient - but this latest environment seems to be born out of a deep desire for stability.
Sometimes we tend to forget that the civil service is made up of regular folks likes you and I who are looking for the same qualities of leadership.
While they may tend to be even more cynical than most because they literally see governments come and go, they are still searching for some consistent, sustainable government.
It's the "let's give these guys a genuine chance to do what they said they would do." It's just that no one is standing from the rooftops saying it.
It's a quiet wait and see attitude.
For the three opposition parties, it would be wise to understand this sentiment and not do too much to rock the boat.
For those three key strategists that have formed the transition team for Interim Leader Graham - get a good handle on the current environment before you make decisions. It's time to put the politics on the back burner.. for the sake of all Canadians.
The Liberals time will come again. In fact If I were a betting man I would say it will come sooner than later - but it has to happen because that is what Canadians want.
The Quiet Acceptance should not be ignored...
By saying nothing, the Ottawa hoard is actually saying a lot!
Wednesday, March 01, 2006
Leadership Test
So with the heat subsided to a low simmer, Prime Minister Harper and the new Conservative government now have to turn their attentions to governing, and perhaps more difficult, fulfilling the election promises they made during the campaign.
Cutting government spending, killing the national childcare deal and cutting the GST were all well received by many Canadians. The real issue is - are they achievable.
Cutting federal spending, while noble in its underlying sentiment, will be challenging as the Liberals adopted all the "quick fix" cuts over their 14 years in power.
Killing the national childcare deal seems to be opposed by at least as many people as support it and it's awfully difficult to win the sympathy vote battle against Canada's grossly underfunded day cares.
While the federal surplus helps to cut the GST, will it be enough?
Add to this the new pressures of Alberta's announcement yesterday that it intends to effectively kill medicare in Canada as we know it and the PM and his team have some very tough days ahead.
These are the days that great leaders triumph and others run the risk of failing.
These are the times that the Canadian public has become more critical and less understanding than any other time in our history.
Canadians are watching Prime Minister and the ball is in your court.
Doesn't it remind you of that old saying " Be careful what you wish for - it may come true!"
Sent on the TELUS Mobility network with BlackBerry
Sunday, February 26, 2006
Leadership Comes in Many Colours
The Torino Winter Olympics ended today much the same way it began 17 days ago - with the world's atheletes putting aside political, religious and territorial differences to celebrate competitive excellence.
From the "Woman of the Games" Cindy Classen to our own Russ Howard, Canada shined on the world stage thanks to hard work, dedication and a true love for what they were doing. And like our Canadian heros, athletes from around the world showed leadership in their respective sports - both in and out of the competition.
As the flag was passed to the Mayor of Vancouver who will host the 2010 Winter Olympics I shed a tear of pride for my country, our position in the world and the awesome way our olympic ambassadors represented each of us in Torin.
I urge all political leaders to take heed. It's that true love of what you do, that dedication, that heart, that Canadians would like to see replicated in our elected leaders as well.
However on this day - let's just be so damn proud to be Canadian.
Although Prime Minister Classen has a nice ring to it:)
From the "Woman of the Games" Cindy Classen to our own Russ Howard, Canada shined on the world stage thanks to hard work, dedication and a true love for what they were doing. And like our Canadian heros, athletes from around the world showed leadership in their respective sports - both in and out of the competition.
As the flag was passed to the Mayor of Vancouver who will host the 2010 Winter Olympics I shed a tear of pride for my country, our position in the world and the awesome way our olympic ambassadors represented each of us in Torin.
I urge all political leaders to take heed. It's that true love of what you do, that dedication, that heart, that Canadians would like to see replicated in our elected leaders as well.
However on this day - let's just be so damn proud to be Canadian.
Although Prime Minister Classen has a nice ring to it:)
Wednesday, February 22, 2006
Good Night and Good Luck!!!
I'm not talking about the new George Cluney movie on Edward R Murrow and Joe McCarthy, but rather the latest drama from our new Prime Minister and his evolving (or is it revolving) list of staffers (although it makes good material for a movie!)
The recent firing of his communications director (4th since becoming leader) shows a potential issue looming in the background - i'm just not sure whether its a good one or a bad one.
Getting rid of a communications director is not a bad thing - particularly early on if it's discovered they are not the right fit for the job, not able to handle the pressure of the job or some combination of both.
Being the communications director for the Prime Minister of Canada is a job not designed for the light-hearted and requires a level of dedication beyond any level most of us will ever be asked to achieve.
Despite was some anti-political types say, communications professionals play an important role within the political environment.
Communication is at the very cornerstone of the Canadian political system and managing that function, so it clearly outlines direction, is critical to ensuring Canadians understand where their elected representatives are heading on any issues.
However, if the latest firing is based on the Prime Minister's "greater" understanding of communications, I am a little worried.
As Don Martin wrote in his column this morning, firing one is no big deal. Firing four is a pattern. As well, given the Prime Minister's track record of fading in and out of the media limelight as leader of the opposition, coupled with the recent Emerson/Fortier blunders, one wonders if the Prime Minister isn't trying to manage issues by blaming someone else.
As well, by naming the head of the Conservative Party's war room in the recent election campaign as his new Director of Comms, the Prime Minister is sending a strong message that communications from the PMO will be extremely political - this despite campaigning on a platform of non partisan, and open and transparent government.
So we'll have to wait and see how this latest drama unfolds and whether it helps to kill the other blunders the PM and his team have faced in the early days. the good thing is it's still the early days. The bad thing is it might be another pattern forming.
William Stairs can run off and write his tell all book "Inside the Harper Government - the first 14 days" and Sandra Buckler can assume the role of spoon feeding journalists with the message of the day.
The recent firing of his communications director (4th since becoming leader) shows a potential issue looming in the background - i'm just not sure whether its a good one or a bad one.
Getting rid of a communications director is not a bad thing - particularly early on if it's discovered they are not the right fit for the job, not able to handle the pressure of the job or some combination of both.
Being the communications director for the Prime Minister of Canada is a job not designed for the light-hearted and requires a level of dedication beyond any level most of us will ever be asked to achieve.
Despite was some anti-political types say, communications professionals play an important role within the political environment.
Communication is at the very cornerstone of the Canadian political system and managing that function, so it clearly outlines direction, is critical to ensuring Canadians understand where their elected representatives are heading on any issues.
However, if the latest firing is based on the Prime Minister's "greater" understanding of communications, I am a little worried.
As Don Martin wrote in his column this morning, firing one is no big deal. Firing four is a pattern. As well, given the Prime Minister's track record of fading in and out of the media limelight as leader of the opposition, coupled with the recent Emerson/Fortier blunders, one wonders if the Prime Minister isn't trying to manage issues by blaming someone else.
As well, by naming the head of the Conservative Party's war room in the recent election campaign as his new Director of Comms, the Prime Minister is sending a strong message that communications from the PMO will be extremely political - this despite campaigning on a platform of non partisan, and open and transparent government.
So we'll have to wait and see how this latest drama unfolds and whether it helps to kill the other blunders the PM and his team have faced in the early days. the good thing is it's still the early days. The bad thing is it might be another pattern forming.
William Stairs can run off and write his tell all book "Inside the Harper Government - the first 14 days" and Sandra Buckler can assume the role of spoon feeding journalists with the message of the day.
Monday, February 20, 2006
Loyalty - More Important than Riches or Fame
So this post is about two recent defections from political parties that have stirred conversations at watercoolers everywhere in New Brunswick. One defector is a national figure who, thorugh his actions, showed political opportunism is running rampid through his veins. The second showed that even the "nice guys finish last" guy can only take so much crap before saying enough is enough.
David Emerson, in an interview Saturday stated he coninues to have a clear conscience after leaving the liberal party banner he was elected under to become the Minister of International Trade.
I read a great analogy lately that said its the same as Team Canada arriving in Torino and, because he didn't like their chances, Manager Wayne Gretzky runs over pulls off his Team Canada sweatshirt and throws on a sweater for Finland.
What Emerson did was just plain wrong and he should belly up, resign and go back to the people that elected him to ask for thier support again, under a different team. He says he entered politics to make a positive contribution to Canada. Start by becoming a politician with integrity - that would be a very positive contribution to Canada.
Speaking to CTV's question period Emerson stated; "The truth of the matter is, when I came into politics I came in as a Paul Martin Liberal, I was not a political person. I'm still not much of a political person, as perhaps you can now tell . . . . I'm not the sharpest political knife in the drawer, I quite freely admit that."
Maybe he is starting to get it.
The second defection came Friday when Mike "Tanker" Malley quit his progressive conservative caucus in New Brunswick to sit as an independent. This is a man, no matter what you think of him, who showed loyalty beyond the call of duty a couple of years ago facing angry mobs - upset over decisions made by the Lord Government.
Now, continuing with his wild political antics that have made him one of the more colourful provincial politicians, he has made a decision that has taken the Lord government from Majority to Minority - literally overnight.
Malley quit after being passed over again for cabinet positions and other political prizes.
And while Lord really had no political choice in his recent cabinet shuffle leading in to an already anticipated election, it's a tough position to be in.
While Malley may soon regret his decision, the reaction by Premier Lord now forces Malley to remain an independent and probably vote against the government is its upcoming budget speech. That will force an election which very well may end the Lord government's seven year run.
Do you show loyalty to those who stood by you - even if it is not the politically correct thing to do?
So we have David Emerson who wasn't loyal to the party that got him elected trying to stave off ongoing calls for his resignation and Bernard Lord, who by not showing loyalty to the friends that stood by him, may pay the ultimate political price.
Seems like being disloyal is a sure fired way to end a career.
At least those who remain loyal are sleeping each night.
David Emerson, in an interview Saturday stated he coninues to have a clear conscience after leaving the liberal party banner he was elected under to become the Minister of International Trade.
I read a great analogy lately that said its the same as Team Canada arriving in Torino and, because he didn't like their chances, Manager Wayne Gretzky runs over pulls off his Team Canada sweatshirt and throws on a sweater for Finland.
What Emerson did was just plain wrong and he should belly up, resign and go back to the people that elected him to ask for thier support again, under a different team. He says he entered politics to make a positive contribution to Canada. Start by becoming a politician with integrity - that would be a very positive contribution to Canada.
Speaking to CTV's question period Emerson stated; "The truth of the matter is, when I came into politics I came in as a Paul Martin Liberal, I was not a political person. I'm still not much of a political person, as perhaps you can now tell . . . . I'm not the sharpest political knife in the drawer, I quite freely admit that."
Maybe he is starting to get it.
The second defection came Friday when Mike "Tanker" Malley quit his progressive conservative caucus in New Brunswick to sit as an independent. This is a man, no matter what you think of him, who showed loyalty beyond the call of duty a couple of years ago facing angry mobs - upset over decisions made by the Lord Government.
Now, continuing with his wild political antics that have made him one of the more colourful provincial politicians, he has made a decision that has taken the Lord government from Majority to Minority - literally overnight.
Malley quit after being passed over again for cabinet positions and other political prizes.
And while Lord really had no political choice in his recent cabinet shuffle leading in to an already anticipated election, it's a tough position to be in.
While Malley may soon regret his decision, the reaction by Premier Lord now forces Malley to remain an independent and probably vote against the government is its upcoming budget speech. That will force an election which very well may end the Lord government's seven year run.
Do you show loyalty to those who stood by you - even if it is not the politically correct thing to do?
So we have David Emerson who wasn't loyal to the party that got him elected trying to stave off ongoing calls for his resignation and Bernard Lord, who by not showing loyalty to the friends that stood by him, may pay the ultimate political price.
Seems like being disloyal is a sure fired way to end a career.
At least those who remain loyal are sleeping each night.
Thursday, February 16, 2006
Time For Posturing To End
Liberal Opposition Leader Bill Graham sat down with the Globe and Mail yesterday for one of his first real interviews since being appointed by Paul Martin a week ago.
Bill Graham is a thoughtful, dedicated politician who has done great work in his different roles on behalf of the Canadian people.
However, Graham's recent posturings show a very politically defiant Graham who states "it's not our job to prop up the government - it's the other guys who created the Harper government"
Mr. Graham and the rest of the current Liberal insiders should remember that it's actually the Canadian public who created the Harper government - not the NDP or the Bloc.Graham goes on to talk about the Liberal's stand leading to a potential election.
For a party that needs a solid dose of self reflection, this external posturing about defeating the government and sticking to "our" points is not what Canadians are looking for.
While I strongly believe Stephen Harper's government will prove too "right" for most Canadians, Liberals should be doing all they can to promote stability - because that's what Canada needs and (even more importantly for the party's future ) its what Canadians want.
As Mr. Graham prepares to move into Stornoway he should remember the common sense approach that made him the sensible choice for interim leader.
Getting political now doesn't serve anyones interests.
Bill Graham is a thoughtful, dedicated politician who has done great work in his different roles on behalf of the Canadian people.
However, Graham's recent posturings show a very politically defiant Graham who states "it's not our job to prop up the government - it's the other guys who created the Harper government"
Mr. Graham and the rest of the current Liberal insiders should remember that it's actually the Canadian public who created the Harper government - not the NDP or the Bloc.Graham goes on to talk about the Liberal's stand leading to a potential election.
For a party that needs a solid dose of self reflection, this external posturing about defeating the government and sticking to "our" points is not what Canadians are looking for.
While I strongly believe Stephen Harper's government will prove too "right" for most Canadians, Liberals should be doing all they can to promote stability - because that's what Canada needs and (even more importantly for the party's future ) its what Canadians want.
As Mr. Graham prepares to move into Stornoway he should remember the common sense approach that made him the sensible choice for interim leader.
Getting political now doesn't serve anyones interests.
Wednesday, February 15, 2006
Great For A Reason
Wayne Gretzky - The Great One.
Greatest Hockey Player that ever lived turned manager turned coach has sparked the loyalty of a nation this week with the ongoing controversy over the alledged gambling ring involving his assistant coach and wife.
Some media reports have been surprised by the huge reaction from Canadians over negative press and loose allegations against Mr. Hockey, they should stop wondering - it's about leadership.
Here's a guy from Brantford Ontario who grew up to become the greatest hockey player that ever lived. He did it the old fashioned way - through hard work, dedication, commitment and an unwaivering sense of responsibility. Gretzky has been a leader on and off the ice since lacing up for that 10 and under leader at age 6. He has lived his life the way he played.
After retiring from playing his leadership did not stop. He used his star status, his shrewd business sense and his knowledge of the game to build a Team Canada dynasty- bringing gold home to its rightful place.
Finally, as coach and managing partner, Gretzky has brought excitement and potential to Pheonix.
In a time when only 65% of Canadians are interested enough to vote in federal politics - with an electorate at every level that seems less than enthused with our political leaders, they turn to those leaders who continue to inspire and give hope.
Wayne Gretzky is that symbol of eternal hope. That a young Canadian boy can grow up and become the greatest hockey player ever means that we can all achieve greatness.
Isn't that the hope all of our leaders should be trying to instill?
Greatest Hockey Player that ever lived turned manager turned coach has sparked the loyalty of a nation this week with the ongoing controversy over the alledged gambling ring involving his assistant coach and wife.
Some media reports have been surprised by the huge reaction from Canadians over negative press and loose allegations against Mr. Hockey, they should stop wondering - it's about leadership.
Here's a guy from Brantford Ontario who grew up to become the greatest hockey player that ever lived. He did it the old fashioned way - through hard work, dedication, commitment and an unwaivering sense of responsibility. Gretzky has been a leader on and off the ice since lacing up for that 10 and under leader at age 6. He has lived his life the way he played.
After retiring from playing his leadership did not stop. He used his star status, his shrewd business sense and his knowledge of the game to build a Team Canada dynasty- bringing gold home to its rightful place.
Finally, as coach and managing partner, Gretzky has brought excitement and potential to Pheonix.
In a time when only 65% of Canadians are interested enough to vote in federal politics - with an electorate at every level that seems less than enthused with our political leaders, they turn to those leaders who continue to inspire and give hope.
Wayne Gretzky is that symbol of eternal hope. That a young Canadian boy can grow up and become the greatest hockey player ever means that we can all achieve greatness.
Isn't that the hope all of our leaders should be trying to instill?
Sunday, February 12, 2006
What Am I Looking For?
Received a comment on the last entry asking "What is leadership to me?"
Good question and one that deserves an answer. While this blog is called In Search of a Leader - you are right to ask the question and determine the factors I use in my ongoing search.
First, you need to understand that my past has given me the opportunity to work with some of the most interesting leaders of our day.
My entry into politics came early as a "Cowan Raider" trying to generate support for then Nova Scotia Liberal Leadership contender and now Senator Jim Cowan. During that time I witnessed and worked with such political heavy weights as Guy Brown(former MLA - NS), Roger Bacon (Former Deputy Premier -NS) and others.
I then moved to "Mecca" (Toronto), where as a journalist I covered the demise of David Peterson and the political rise (and fall) of Bob Rae.
I was able to then move back to Atlantic Canada where I eventually went to work for Frank McKenna. In addition I have worked closely with election campaigns for Jean Chretien and Paul Martin.
I have worked with countless municipal, provincial and federal politicians, community leaders, social leaders, religious leaders and youth leaders in my capacity of journalist and then communications consultant.
Finally I have been a student of politics and political campaigns my entire life.
I spend this time to let you know where my personal views were formed.
Now that the history lesson is over, "What does leadership mean to me?"
First, a leader does not have to be a politician, although in the current system it's the quickest way to have impact on the lives of Canadians
- A leader is one who first and foremost listens. Listens to members of his or her party, listens to special interest groups, listens to the loudest and the smallest voices, but most importantly listens to the general sentiment of Canadians as a collective.
- A leader is a great communicator. This is the biggest part of the job. They need to get ideas across, inspire people to take action and defuse when emotions run high.
- A leader is one who is not afraid to put their careers on the line standing up for what they believe in.
- A leader is one who lives with compassion, conviction and commitment.
- A leader understands the needs of those without a strong voice and includes and protects them.
-A leader understands when it stops being about those represent and more about themselves - and get out before that happens.
Finally a leader, regardless of their position, their responsibilities and their affiliation, has the ability to inspire those they lead to rise up and do for themselves, to make their situation better, to improve conditions for everyone.
These are my liberal views of what a leader should possess. I've found elements of these in some, but not enough. The search will continue.
Good question and one that deserves an answer. While this blog is called In Search of a Leader - you are right to ask the question and determine the factors I use in my ongoing search.
First, you need to understand that my past has given me the opportunity to work with some of the most interesting leaders of our day.
My entry into politics came early as a "Cowan Raider" trying to generate support for then Nova Scotia Liberal Leadership contender and now Senator Jim Cowan. During that time I witnessed and worked with such political heavy weights as Guy Brown(former MLA - NS), Roger Bacon (Former Deputy Premier -NS) and others.
I then moved to "Mecca" (Toronto), where as a journalist I covered the demise of David Peterson and the political rise (and fall) of Bob Rae.
I was able to then move back to Atlantic Canada where I eventually went to work for Frank McKenna. In addition I have worked closely with election campaigns for Jean Chretien and Paul Martin.
I have worked with countless municipal, provincial and federal politicians, community leaders, social leaders, religious leaders and youth leaders in my capacity of journalist and then communications consultant.
Finally I have been a student of politics and political campaigns my entire life.
I spend this time to let you know where my personal views were formed.
Now that the history lesson is over, "What does leadership mean to me?"
First, a leader does not have to be a politician, although in the current system it's the quickest way to have impact on the lives of Canadians
- A leader is one who first and foremost listens. Listens to members of his or her party, listens to special interest groups, listens to the loudest and the smallest voices, but most importantly listens to the general sentiment of Canadians as a collective.
- A leader is a great communicator. This is the biggest part of the job. They need to get ideas across, inspire people to take action and defuse when emotions run high.
- A leader is one who is not afraid to put their careers on the line standing up for what they believe in.
- A leader is one who lives with compassion, conviction and commitment.
- A leader understands the needs of those without a strong voice and includes and protects them.
-A leader understands when it stops being about those represent and more about themselves - and get out before that happens.
Finally a leader, regardless of their position, their responsibilities and their affiliation, has the ability to inspire those they lead to rise up and do for themselves, to make their situation better, to improve conditions for everyone.
These are my liberal views of what a leader should possess. I've found elements of these in some, but not enough. The search will continue.
Calling All Visionaries
So the Globe and Mail is reporting a herd of potential liberal leadership contenders are burning up the phone lines looking for that almighty endorsement from sitting members, top party brass and the inside influencers.
The problem for me is the names read like a who's who in Paul Martin's former liberal government. With the exception of Michael Ignatieff, almost all those making noise sat in Paul Martin's last cabinet or (potentially even more troublesome) were part of Jean Chretien's last cabinet.
With the top contenders already pulling out of the race, the hoard of also rans are looking to raise their own personal profile. Some are doing this for greater name recognition (very important when you leave politics and start your consulting career) while others, I'm sure, believe today they have a vision and direction that could lead Canada to its new promised land.
The problem, as history shows us, is that those coming from the inside typically do not have a great new vision and we tend to get a rehash from the past. While some of the names being thrown around, including guys like Ken Dryden, certainly have the social conscience, their vision is not terribly new.
Before the Liberal Party of Canada runs off and elects a new leader it should spend some time reflecting on how it came to where it rests today.
1) Why did the Canadian electorate lose faith in the party and its leaders?
2) What issues are most important to Canadians?
3) Why did only 65% (an increase from 2004!) turn out to vote?
4) What does the LPC stand for today?
I've said it before - Canadians are looking to see some of themselves in a government and in a Prime Minister. Stephen Harper's success is, due in large part, to his grass roots appeal and the fact that he did not come from an elitist background, but rather an ordinary Canadian upbringing.
Canada needs a left of center, grass roots visionary who understands that Canada is the greatest country in the world - its better days ahead not behind. Canada wants a leader that understands regional and cultural differences but, in the end, is able to unify all Canadians in a common cause and a common direction.
Finally, Canadians are looking for a visionary who can lead us to a new level of prosperity, social inclusion and quality of life.
Before running out and getting yesterdays superstars, look to what the future needs. If we do that, my guess is the next leader's name has yet to be mentioned.
The problem for me is the names read like a who's who in Paul Martin's former liberal government. With the exception of Michael Ignatieff, almost all those making noise sat in Paul Martin's last cabinet or (potentially even more troublesome) were part of Jean Chretien's last cabinet.
With the top contenders already pulling out of the race, the hoard of also rans are looking to raise their own personal profile. Some are doing this for greater name recognition (very important when you leave politics and start your consulting career) while others, I'm sure, believe today they have a vision and direction that could lead Canada to its new promised land.
The problem, as history shows us, is that those coming from the inside typically do not have a great new vision and we tend to get a rehash from the past. While some of the names being thrown around, including guys like Ken Dryden, certainly have the social conscience, their vision is not terribly new.
Before the Liberal Party of Canada runs off and elects a new leader it should spend some time reflecting on how it came to where it rests today.
1) Why did the Canadian electorate lose faith in the party and its leaders?
2) What issues are most important to Canadians?
3) Why did only 65% (an increase from 2004!) turn out to vote?
4) What does the LPC stand for today?
I've said it before - Canadians are looking to see some of themselves in a government and in a Prime Minister. Stephen Harper's success is, due in large part, to his grass roots appeal and the fact that he did not come from an elitist background, but rather an ordinary Canadian upbringing.
Canada needs a left of center, grass roots visionary who understands that Canada is the greatest country in the world - its better days ahead not behind. Canada wants a leader that understands regional and cultural differences but, in the end, is able to unify all Canadians in a common cause and a common direction.
Finally, Canadians are looking for a visionary who can lead us to a new level of prosperity, social inclusion and quality of life.
Before running out and getting yesterdays superstars, look to what the future needs. If we do that, my guess is the next leader's name has yet to be mentioned.
Friday, February 10, 2006
Plan A is Working - Just Two Weeks Too Late
So if you believe that the Liberal election strategy during the recent federal election campaign was to allow Stephen Harper to self destruct you realize now that didn't work. In fact by the time the Liberal insiders figured out that they needed to go to plan B (oh my God we Don't Have a Plan B!) it was too late...
or was it?
Seems if the Liberals had called a 70 day campaign their plan might have worked!
Conservative back benchers, including the always colourful Garth Turner, have started to turn on their leader and his "Two can play that game" decision to recruit political opportunist David Emerson.
This may turn out to be the shortest political honeymoon in Canadian history (less than 2 hours by my count) before the gloves came off and criticisms began to fly in every direction.
Another important element in being a great leader is knowing when to retreat so you can live and fight another day. Not sure Stephen Harper is prepared to die on the David Emerson decision, however with hints of a reversal on the national childcare policy maybe he can't afford to flip flop on yet another decision.
Question - if we have another federal election in 2006 do the same returing officers get to do the job?
or was it?
Seems if the Liberals had called a 70 day campaign their plan might have worked!
Conservative back benchers, including the always colourful Garth Turner, have started to turn on their leader and his "Two can play that game" decision to recruit political opportunist David Emerson.
This may turn out to be the shortest political honeymoon in Canadian history (less than 2 hours by my count) before the gloves came off and criticisms began to fly in every direction.
Another important element in being a great leader is knowing when to retreat so you can live and fight another day. Not sure Stephen Harper is prepared to die on the David Emerson decision, however with hints of a reversal on the national childcare policy maybe he can't afford to flip flop on yet another decision.
Question - if we have another federal election in 2006 do the same returing officers get to do the job?
Wednesday, February 08, 2006
Are your Pants On Fire?
A senior conservative political operative (you know who you are) was providing colour commentary for one of the national networks during this weeks swearing in ceremony at Rideau Hall. During the great hullabaloo over the David Emerson defection this conservative "mastermind" clearly stated that Emerson approached the conservative party to cross the floor.
When asked to clarify he again stated that Emerson approached the conservatives. 2 hours later Prime Minister Harper unequivocly stated that they (the conservatives) approached Emerson.
That has since been supported by the continued media frenzy over the "coup that went bad.". So either the senior strategist, a man who helped to design national policy or the PM are not telling the truth.
The first rule in being.a good leader is making sure all your supporters deliver the same key messages - scrap that - the first rule about being a great leader is setting example so you don't have to rely on the key messages in the first place.
Sent on the TELUS Mobility network with BlackBerry
Monday, February 06, 2006
Canada's New "leadership"
So Stephen Harper was sworn in as Canada's 22 Prime Minister and he appointed his new, slimmer version of cabinet. While the proof will be in the pudding, it strikes me at first glance that Harper tried hard to balance all interests to the point he may have ended up offending everyone. The big story of the day was the defection of former Liberal cabinet star David Emerson - now the conservative Minister of International Trade. Campaigning on honesty and integrity Harper needed to be even more careful on the decisions he made. While at first glance Emerson looks like big win, it may turn out to be the defining move that labels harper as an also ran who was just like everyone else. Appointing Emerson puts Harper in the same position he recently criticized the former government over. It also may not play so well within his own caucus where competition will continue to grow as wanna be's stand their ground. Emerson also showed that politics and loyalty have no common place - a real reason the Canadian electorate has no trust in the political system. We want to see ourselves in our government but we don't like the lying, cheating part - that's a reflection we can do without.
Perhaps the biggest disgrace of the day though was the shameless media machine who was tripping over themselves to compliment the incoming PM and his team to ensure good access moving forward. If craig Oliver had said one more time that the cabinet was "masterfully" put together I thought I would gag.
So we have our new PM and his merry band of cabinet ministers. Now their vision of Canada can move towards reality. For our sakes I hope it's one that reflect all of Canada - not just the parts that said yes to Prime Minister Harper.
Sent on the TELUS Mobility network with BlackBerry
Thursday, February 02, 2006
Loyalty in Leadership - an Update
True signs of leadership sometimes come at the strangest times!!
Another classy performance from Paul Martin.
If he keeps this up, Canadians won't want him to leave!!!
Another classy performance from Paul Martin.
If he keeps this up, Canadians won't want him to leave!!!
Loyalty in Leadership
Outgoing Prime Minister Paul Martin is scheduled to respond to the final report of the Gomery Commission Today - the process that many claim defeated the Liberals in the recent federal election. While I think the defeat is much more complicated than that, I wonder what purpose it will servce to respond to the report that clearly now has little to do with the current environment.
What happened with sponsorship was wrong and those responsible have paid a price. While you and I would have gone to jail for this kind of action, the real story, i believe, is much more complicated and less cloak and dagger than Gomery and the Media have made it out to be. This all transpired during the potential breakup of our country. What would you do to prevent the country from breaking up? Cutting corners is wrong, but I can clearly see how it might evolve to that.
So now, many months later, the process has come to its logical conclusion and Prime Minister Harper will pay lip service to a report (which cost as much as the scandal itself) that does not reflect the current conditions in Ottawa. So why comment? Does Martin have anything to say that will not damage the party's standing with Canadians even further. If so, then all the power to you. If not, it wreaks of sour milk and sandbox shinanegans that the Liberal Party and Canadians in general don't need to see.
Think before you speak and remember where your loyalties should lie.
What happened with sponsorship was wrong and those responsible have paid a price. While you and I would have gone to jail for this kind of action, the real story, i believe, is much more complicated and less cloak and dagger than Gomery and the Media have made it out to be. This all transpired during the potential breakup of our country. What would you do to prevent the country from breaking up? Cutting corners is wrong, but I can clearly see how it might evolve to that.
So now, many months later, the process has come to its logical conclusion and Prime Minister Harper will pay lip service to a report (which cost as much as the scandal itself) that does not reflect the current conditions in Ottawa. So why comment? Does Martin have anything to say that will not damage the party's standing with Canadians even further. If so, then all the power to you. If not, it wreaks of sour milk and sandbox shinanegans that the Liberal Party and Canadians in general don't need to see.
Think before you speak and remember where your loyalties should lie.
Tuesday, January 31, 2006
She Made the Dream Come True
Corretta Scott King, the wife of Martin Luther King died today at the age of 78. The manner in which she lived her life was nothing less than inspirational. She did it because she believed, she cared and most of all she loved. A True Leader in every sense.
For more
For more
A Classy Exit
The following is from Paul Martin to Liberal Supporters. While time for him to go, it has certainly been a classy exit to stage left.
One more curtain call Mr. Martin for a lifetime of service to your country.
Thank you from Paul Martin January 24, 2006
Dear Friends:
At the end of a tremendous campaign I want to thank each and every one of you for your hard work and support. I am so proud of what we have accomplished – in eight weeks and 18 months – for Canada and for Canadians.
The economy has never been stronger. Last month the national rate of unemployment reached a 30 year low. We delivered 8 balanced budgets in a row. We have paid down $60 billion in debt while easing the tax burden on every Canadian. These are impressive numbers – but consider what they represent: for Canadians today it is easier to find work and to pay the bills, easier to afford a home. It's easier to bring up families and to provide for them.
We all worked hard for this and we should all be proud. But what we should be proud of most of all is that we didn't take any of this for granted – we built on it. We accepted our prosperity and we reinvested it – in one another, in Canada.
Working with the provinces, working together we laid the foundation for a national program for early learning and child care – the first new social program in a generation. We strengthened our public health care system – lowering wait times, expanding access to hospitals, extending research. We set aside millions to clean up our rivers and streams, lakes and oceans; and billions more in new technologies and new ideas to deal with climate change. We brought the cities and communities we live in to the national table. We invested in their needs directly.
We reached an historic agreement with First Nation, Métis and Inuit leaders to raise the living standards of Aboriginal Canadians. We stood up for the Charter of Rights and Freedoms – declaring that every person's rights should be protected. We stood on the world stage and spoke with a clear, strong voice, and acted with compassion, generosity and resolve in the face of need, in the face of tragedy.
We have done all this looking forward. Because we in Canada believe that what we represent is where the world is going. A country that will never stray from the values on which it was founded: mutual respect, fairness and generosity. A country where every person has an equal opportunity – to contribute and to benefit from our collective prosperity.
We have accomplished so much. We have prepared Canada for great things. We did it together.
Thank you.
One more curtain call Mr. Martin for a lifetime of service to your country.
Thank you from Paul Martin January 24, 2006
Dear Friends:
At the end of a tremendous campaign I want to thank each and every one of you for your hard work and support. I am so proud of what we have accomplished – in eight weeks and 18 months – for Canada and for Canadians.
The economy has never been stronger. Last month the national rate of unemployment reached a 30 year low. We delivered 8 balanced budgets in a row. We have paid down $60 billion in debt while easing the tax burden on every Canadian. These are impressive numbers – but consider what they represent: for Canadians today it is easier to find work and to pay the bills, easier to afford a home. It's easier to bring up families and to provide for them.
We all worked hard for this and we should all be proud. But what we should be proud of most of all is that we didn't take any of this for granted – we built on it. We accepted our prosperity and we reinvested it – in one another, in Canada.
Working with the provinces, working together we laid the foundation for a national program for early learning and child care – the first new social program in a generation. We strengthened our public health care system – lowering wait times, expanding access to hospitals, extending research. We set aside millions to clean up our rivers and streams, lakes and oceans; and billions more in new technologies and new ideas to deal with climate change. We brought the cities and communities we live in to the national table. We invested in their needs directly.
We reached an historic agreement with First Nation, Métis and Inuit leaders to raise the living standards of Aboriginal Canadians. We stood up for the Charter of Rights and Freedoms – declaring that every person's rights should be protected. We stood on the world stage and spoke with a clear, strong voice, and acted with compassion, generosity and resolve in the face of need, in the face of tragedy.
We have done all this looking forward. Because we in Canada believe that what we represent is where the world is going. A country that will never stray from the values on which it was founded: mutual respect, fairness and generosity. A country where every person has an equal opportunity – to contribute and to benefit from our collective prosperity.
We have accomplished so much. We have prepared Canada for great things. We did it together.
Thank you.
Back For Good
Okay - the absence has been too long.
I could say It's my internal procrastinator kicking in or I could say that I have been really really busy, but I actually think this one is deeper than that.
Back in December I urged folks (not that anyone actually reads this) to vote with their gut feelings and last Monday they did just that.
Prime Minister Harper is still not rolling quickly off my tongue, but it's a win he and his party deserve. Whether or not I believe in their policies and direction - they gave Canadians the answers they were looking for. They were able to connect better with the electorate - and for that they win the prize.
Now the Liberals must start what should be (if they are truly serious about governing again any time soon) a long and thought provoking leadership hunt. While the usual band of suspects is being touted, they need to take time to reconfirm what being a Liberal in Canada really means.
In many respects, the Liberal Party in Canada and the Democratic Party in the US should spend some time and compare notes. The internal party powerbrokers who lead the party to a place foreign to most child raising, tax paying voters, is not the right direction for parties that were founded on being champions of social and fiscal balance.
So what has this got to do with my not writing for so long. Well, i wasn't sure what was missing in this race for supreme Canadian power (kind of like the final survivor) until today. We were missing a reason to get excited about picking a government and a leader.
Canada, in my opinion, is the greatest country in the world. We are respected around the globe, we are committed to helping those who need it the most and we are proud of our heritage.
In the last decade Canada has experienced continued growth, reductions in unemployment, continued praise on the world stage - all deserved and a result of hard work. But it seems as though there is no big issue to get excited about and without big issues - great leaders don't always emerge.
Frank McKenna, who I beleieve was a great New Brunswick leader at a time when the province needed to feel better about itself, announced yesterday he will not seek the nomination of the Liberal Party. While he cited personal reasons, I wonder if he too is struggling with the defining issue that will seperate parties, invigroate the electorate and create a real passion for one side or the other.
As Stephen Harper ponders his batting lineup and as the Liberals look to lick their wounds and prop up a new leader for the "next time" I think we should all step back and ask ourselves why only 65% of Canadians bothered to vote? Why do the majority of young adults have difficulty connecting with any political party? What is it that Canadians feel passionate about?
The answers to these questions will begin to set the stage for the next Canada - the Canada yet to come.
As we define what that Canada needs to be, future leaders pay attention.
I could say It's my internal procrastinator kicking in or I could say that I have been really really busy, but I actually think this one is deeper than that.
Back in December I urged folks (not that anyone actually reads this) to vote with their gut feelings and last Monday they did just that.
Prime Minister Harper is still not rolling quickly off my tongue, but it's a win he and his party deserve. Whether or not I believe in their policies and direction - they gave Canadians the answers they were looking for. They were able to connect better with the electorate - and for that they win the prize.
Now the Liberals must start what should be (if they are truly serious about governing again any time soon) a long and thought provoking leadership hunt. While the usual band of suspects is being touted, they need to take time to reconfirm what being a Liberal in Canada really means.
In many respects, the Liberal Party in Canada and the Democratic Party in the US should spend some time and compare notes. The internal party powerbrokers who lead the party to a place foreign to most child raising, tax paying voters, is not the right direction for parties that were founded on being champions of social and fiscal balance.
So what has this got to do with my not writing for so long. Well, i wasn't sure what was missing in this race for supreme Canadian power (kind of like the final survivor) until today. We were missing a reason to get excited about picking a government and a leader.
Canada, in my opinion, is the greatest country in the world. We are respected around the globe, we are committed to helping those who need it the most and we are proud of our heritage.
In the last decade Canada has experienced continued growth, reductions in unemployment, continued praise on the world stage - all deserved and a result of hard work. But it seems as though there is no big issue to get excited about and without big issues - great leaders don't always emerge.
Frank McKenna, who I beleieve was a great New Brunswick leader at a time when the province needed to feel better about itself, announced yesterday he will not seek the nomination of the Liberal Party. While he cited personal reasons, I wonder if he too is struggling with the defining issue that will seperate parties, invigroate the electorate and create a real passion for one side or the other.
As Stephen Harper ponders his batting lineup and as the Liberals look to lick their wounds and prop up a new leader for the "next time" I think we should all step back and ask ourselves why only 65% of Canadians bothered to vote? Why do the majority of young adults have difficulty connecting with any political party? What is it that Canadians feel passionate about?
The answers to these questions will begin to set the stage for the next Canada - the Canada yet to come.
As we define what that Canada needs to be, future leaders pay attention.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)